Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Drop downs are lower/higher and early/later. Markov Manufacturing recently spent $15.0 million to purchase some equipment used in the manufacture of disk drives. The firm
Drop downs are lower/higher and early/later.
Markov Manufacturing recently spent $15.0 million to purchase some equipment used in the manufacture of disk drives. The firm expects that this equipment will have a useful life of five years, and its marginal corporate tax rate is 21%. The company plans to use straight-line depreciation. a. What is the annual depreciation expense associated with this equipment? b. What is the annual depreciation tax shield? c. Rather than straight-line depreciation, suppose Markov will use the MACRS depreciation method for the five-year life of the property. Calculate the depreciation tax shield each year for this equipment under this accelerated depreciation schedule. d. If Markov has a choice between straight-line and MACRS depreciation schedules, and its marginal corporate tax rate is expected to remain constant, which schedule should it choose? Why? e. How might your answer to part (d) change if Markov anticipates that its marginal corporate tax rate will increase substantially over the next five years? f. Under the TCJA of 2017, Markov has the option to take 100% "Bonus" depreciation in the year in which the equipment is put into use. This means that in that year, Markov would take the full depreciation expense equivalent to the cost of buying the equipment. Rather than straight-line depreciation, suppose Markov will use the bonus depreciation method. Calculate the depreciation tax shield each year for this equipment with bonus depreciation. g. If Markov has a choice between straight-line, MACRS and bonus depreciation schedules, and its marginal corporate tax rate is expected to remain constant, which schedule should it choose? Why? h. How might your answer to part (g) change if Markov anticipates that its marginal corporate tax rate will increase substantially over the next five years? Note: Assume that the equipment is put into use in year 1. a. What is the annual depreciation expense associated with this equipment? The annual depreciation expense is s million (Round to three decimal places.) b. What is the annual depreciation tax shield? The annual depreciation tax shield is million. (Round to three decimal places.) C. Rather than straight-line depreciation, suppose Markov will use the MACRS depreciation method for the five-year life of the property. Calculate the depreciation tax shield each year for this equipment under this accelerated depreciation schedule. The depreciation tax shield for year 1 is 5 million (Round to three decimal places.) The depreciation tax shield for year 2 is s million. (Round to three decimal places.) The depreciation tax shield for year 3 is SL million. (Round to three decimal places.) The depreciation tax shield for year 4 is SL million. (Round to three decimal places.) The depreciation tax shield for year 5 is s million. (Round to three decimal places.) The depreciation tax shield for year 6 is SL million. (Round to three decimal places.) d. If Markov has a choice between straight-line and MACRS depreciation schedules, and its marginal corporate tax rate is expected to remain constant, which schedule should it choose? Why? (Select the best choice below.) O A. With either method, the total depreciation tax shield is the same. Therefore, it does not matter which method is used. O B. With straight-line depreciation, the firm's depreciation expenses are lower initially, leading to higher earnings. Thus, straight-line depreciation leads to a higher NPV of Markov's FCF. O C. With MACRS, the firm receives the depreciation tax shields sooner. Thus, MACRS depreciation leads to a higher NPV of Markov's FCF. O D. The straight-line depreciation is recommended only for assets that last more than 5 years. e. How might your answer to part (d) change if Markov anticipates that its marginal corporate tax rate will increase substantially over the next five years? (Select the best choice below.) O A. Markov may be better off using the straight-line method if it expects its tax rate to decrease substantially in later years. OB. The straight-line depreciation is recommended only for companies whose tax rates are higher than 21%. O C. Even if its tax rate is expected to change, Markov is better off using MACRS depreciation rather than straight-line depreciation. OD. Markov may be better off using the straight-line method if it expects its tax rate to increase substantially in later years. f. Under the TCJA of 2017, Markov has the option to take 100% "Bonus" depreciation in the year in which the equipment is put into use. This means that in that year, Markov would take the full depreciation expense equivalent to the cost of buying the equipment. Rather than straight-line depreciation, suppose Markov will use the bonus depreciation method. Calculate the depreciation tax shield each year for this equipment with bonus depreciation. The depreciation tax shield for year 1 is $ million. (Round to three decimal places.) The depreciation tax shield for years 2-6 is $ million (Round to three decimal places.) g. If Markov has a choice between straight-line, MACRS and bonus depreciation schedules, and its marginal corporate tax rate is expected to remain constant, which schedule should it choose? Why? (Select the best choice below.) O A. In all cases, its total depreciation tax shield is the same. But with bonus depreciation, it receives the entire depreciation tax shield in year 1-thus, bonus depreciation leads to a higher NPV of Markov's FCF O B. In all cases, its total depreciation tax shield is the same. But with bonus depreciation, it receives the entire depreciation tax shield in year 3thus, bonus depreciation leads to a higher NPV of Markov's FCF. O C. In all cases, its total depreciation tax shield is the same. But with bonus depreciation, it receives the entire depreciation tax shield in year 2thus, bonus depreciation leads to a higher NPV of Markov's FCF. OD. In all cases, its total depreciation tax shield is the same. But with bonus depreciation, it receives the entire depreciation tax shield in year 0thus, bonus depreciation leads to a higher NPV of Markov's FCF h. How might your answer to part (9) change if Markov anticipates that its marginal corporate tax rate will increase substantially over the next five years? (Select from the drop-down menus.) As in the case of MACRS, if the tax rate will increase substantially, then Markov may be better off claiming depreciation expenses in V years because the tax benefit at that time will be greaterStep by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started