During a recent evaluation of staff by the Senior accountant who heads the accounting department the five Accounts assistants in the department were rated as follows in terms of quality of work output: a) Richard Obbo = 78% b) Esperance Uwase = 68% c) Adan Duale = 70% d) Shamim Mambo = 56% wwwwww e) Teddy Abalo = 50% However, a new evaluation conducted by ahired consultancy firm using the paired comparison method of performance evaluation shows that, for instance, in relation to quality of work outputs Abalo performs better than Uwase, Duale, Mambo and Obbo. Uwase performs better than Obbo but worse than Abalo, Mambo and Duale. Obbo performs better than Mambo but worse than the rest of the assistant accountants. Mambo performs better than Uwase and Duale but worse than Abalo and Obbo. On the other hand, Duale performs better than Uwase and Obbo but worse than Abalo and Mambo. It is therefore impossible that the scores by the senior accountant can be justified based on the new evaluation. Required a) Construct a Paired Comparison Performance Evaluation Matrix using the information provided by the consultancy firm mentioned in the Case study. b) Based on the information from the matrix in c) above, identify the best employee in terms of Quality of work outputs. (total 40 marks)