During fall 2020, a COVID-related survey was conducted on WKU's campus. This SPSS output file examines perceived susceptibiity by role on campus (student, faculty, staff, administrator). After reading it carefully, please do the following:

• State a non-directional null and alternative hypothesis
• State the level of significance used
• State your decision (reject or fail to reject) and WHY you rejected it.
• Interpret the post-hoc table, if it is appropriate to do do.
• Explain the findings in a way someone who does not know statistics could understand. Please be specific and thorough

Descriptives Susceptibility Scale 95% Confidence Interval for Mean N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum Faculty 249 2.9819 61784 03915 2.9048 3.0590 1.00 4.00 Staff 342 2.9635 59517 03218 2.9001 3.0268 1.00 4.00 Student 1277 2.8332 77605 02172 2.7906 2.8758 1.00 4.00 Administration 32 2.8906 54970 .09717 2.6924 3.0888 2.00 4.00 Total 1900 2.8771 72605 01666 2.8444 2.9098 1.00 4.00 ANOVA Susceptibleale Sum of Squares df Mean Square Sig Between Groups 7.753 3 2.584 4.933 002 Within Groups 993.301 1896 524 Total 1001.054 1899 Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable: Susceptibility Scale Tukey HSD (1) Which best describes your (J) Which best describes your Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval primary role at WKU? primary role at WKU? (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound Faculty Staff 01848 .06030 .990 -.1366 1735 Student 14872 05014 016 0198 2777 Administration 09130 13593 908 -.2582 4408 Staff Faculty .01848 .06030 990 -. 1735 1366 Student 13025 04407 017 0169 2436 Administration 07283 13380 948 -.2712 4169 Student Faculty -.14872 .05014 .016 .2777 .0198 Staff .13025 .04407 .017 -.2436 .0169 Administration .05742 12955 971 .3905 2757 Administration Faculty -.09130 13593 .908 -.4408 2582 Staff -.07283 13380 948 -.4169 2712 Student 05742 12955 971 2757 3905 *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level