Question
Dynasty Kitchen Cabinets v. Soheili, 2011 BCPC 414 (CanLII) The corporate defendant consented to a judgment against it. The issue was whether its owner/director, Soheili,
- Dynasty Kitchen Cabinets v. Soheili, 2011 BCPC 414 (CanLII)
The corporate defendant consented to a judgment against it. The issue was whether its owner/director, Soheili, was personally liable. Dynasty provided cabinets for Soheili's personal residence. The transaction was with the corporate defendant. The house went into foreclosure, but Dynasty was owed $250 000. Soheili did not give a personal guarantee; he owed $250 000 to the corporate defendant for the cabinets.
Is this a case in which the Court would "lift the corporate veil"? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Business Law and the Legal Environment
Authors: Susan S. Samuelson, Jeffrey F. Beatty
7th edition
1285860381, 978-1305445864, 1305445864, 978-0357689646, 978-1285860381
