Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

E . . . B C D E M 0 w No feedback (sec) Feedback (sec) edback - no feedback) Last Name 45 54 9

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
E . . . B C D E M 0 w No feedback (sec) Feedback (sec) edback - no feedback) Last Name 45 54 9 First Name Is the effe stically significant a level of 0.05? 29 Using one or two sentences, interpret the 95%% confidence interval for this data. = 8 10 41.6 50.1 8.5 14.15940991 11.36710654 5.89255651 Is the null valu e 95% CI? 17 SED 1.863389981 4.561578674 Critical t 2.262 Upper 95%% Cl for the mean difference 12.71498814 Note that the data in homewe Lower 95% CI for the mean difference 4.285011862 Effect size -0.600307503 24 SEN 4.477598563 3.594594707 0.916355981 26 27 4.214988138 4.214988138 28 29 E Sheet1 +K o+ E .. . C E G M N 0 Q s w Control dControls dControls2 Paraplegic dParaplegic dParaplegic2 Tetrapleg dTetraplegia dParaplegic2 1.7 -1.75 3.0625 6.5 0.25 0.0625 19.9 3.008333333 9.050069442 1.85 0.7225 5.7 -0.55 0.3025 16.3 -0.591666667 0.3500694448 0.35 0. 1225 3.6 -2.65 7.0225 15.6 -1.291666667 1.668402779 2.25 5.0625 8.7 2.45 6.0025 17.4 0.508333333 0.2584027774 2.35 5.5225 6.1 -0.15 0.0225 11.5 -5.391666667 29.0700694 0.85 0.7225 7.9 1.65 2.7225 17.2 0.308333333 0.09506944424 1.25 1.5625 6.7 0.45 0.2025 18.1 1.208333333 1.460069444 Group means 0.85 Grand mean dB2 D.7225 6.6 0.35 0. 1225 15.9 -0.991666667 0.9834027784 Control 3.45 -5.41 0.25 8.86 29.3102 0.0625 6.2 -0.05 0.0025 19.8 2.908333333 8.45840277 Paraplegic 6.25 8.86 -2.61 1.15 5.9 6.8324 1.3225 -0.35 0.1225 20.9 4.008333333 16.06673611 Tetraplegia 16.892 8.86 8.03 64.4452 1.75 3.0625 4.8 -1.45 2. 1025 15.4 -1.491666667 2.225069445 2.55 3.5025 6.3 0.05 0.0025 14.7 -2.191666667 4.803402779 100.5878 Sum 41.4 28.45 75 18.69 202.7 74.48916667 Group mean 3.45 6.25 16.89166667 ANOVA SUMMARY TABLE MS Group SD 1.608217534 ss 1.303491814 2.602257179 Between 1207.05 2 603.5269444 163.74682 Grand mean 8.86 Error (within) 21.6292 33 3.685732323 Group N 36 Total 1328.6831 20 SSB 1207.05389 21 Pairwise Comparisons Mean difference > HSD? (yes or no) 22 MSB 603.526944 Paraplegic - control 2.8 yes 23 SSE 121.6292 Tetraplegia - control 24 ME 13.44166667 yes 33 25 Tetraplegia - parapleg 10.64166567 yes MSE 3.68573232 26 SSTotal 1328.68 At what alpha levels (0.10, 0.05, 0.01) is the over ant? At 0.01 it is statistically significant 27 163.746819 28 Ferit (a = 0.01) 5.312 29 Ferit (a = 0.05) 3.285 30 Ferit (a = 0.10 2.471 31 q (a= 0.05) 3.486 Interpret the post hoc com 32 HSD 1.93196234 33 R2 (eta2) 0.90845886 Interpret the R2 that was calculated. E Sheet1 V +

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Hyers-Ulam Stability Of Ordinary Differential Equations

Authors: Arun Kumar Tripathy

1st Edition

1000386902, 9781000386905

More Books

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions

Question

Has your organisation defined its purpose, vision and mission?

Answered: 1 week ago