Each of the following represents public policy reasons for the tort of strict liability except: There are certain products and activities that can place the public at risk - even if all reasonable care was taken. O Negligence cases were too easy for plaintiffs to win and recover damages. O The cost of injury should be borne by the manufacturer or the seller, which is the party in the best position to detect, eliminate and insure against risk. O Imposing strict liability encourages the manufacturer to "go the ext mile" to produce safer products. O Consumers needed to be better protected from unsafe products. < Previous