Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Economic You can hire companies staffed by non-lawyers that will help you fight the speeding ticket that you got. Like these guys https://www.gotaticketfightit.com/. They can
Economic
You can hire companies staffed by non-lawyers that will help you fight the speeding ticket that you got. Like these guys https://www.gotaticketfightit.com/. They can even represent you in court. That pretty much tells you that speeding tickets are dealt with in: Select one: O a. Provincial Court O b. Court of Queen's Bench O c. The Alberta Traffic Commission O d. The Alberta Court of AppealYou can hire companies staffed by non-lawyers that will help you fight the speeding ticket that you got. Like these guys https://www.gotaticketfightit.com/. They can even represent you in court. That pretty much tells you that speeding tickets are dealt with in: Select one: O a. Provincial Court O b. Court of Queen's Bench O c. The Alberta Traffic Commission O d. The Alberta Court of AppealWhich of the following should not be considered when doing a cost/benefit analysis to determine whether or not to sue a debtor? Select one: O a. The wages you will lose when attending the trial. O b. The desire for revenge you feel against the debtor. O c. The likelihood of collecting the judgment you are awarded by the trial judge. O d. The probability you will win the lawsuit.Which one of the following statements is false in regards to Provincial Court, which is often referred to as small claims court? Select one: O a. You can sue for more than $50,000 in Provincial Court with the permission of a Provincial Court Judge. O b. The jurisdiction of small claims court is currently $50,000. O c. If your claim is greater than the jurisdiction of small claims court, you may proceed with your claim in small claims court, but only if you agree to abandon the amount of your claim over that jurisdiction. O d. If your claim is greater than the jurisdiction of small claims court, you may proceed with your entire claim in the Court of Queen's Bench.Angus discussed the Criminal case of R. v. Lavallee, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 852 in class. Which of the following is something Angus does NOT agree with? Select one: Q a. The fact that Lavallee likely suffered from "battered wife syndrome" was crucial evidence in this case. O b. All lawyers thought it would be appropriate for the Supreme Court to hear more cases like this where they try and set social policy, that is tell the Canadian public what the important issues are they should address. O C. Although the Defendant Lavallee was found not guilty of murder due to self defence. the legal test for self defence does not work very well given that she shot her common law husband as he was walking away, and why was this the time when she felt her life was actually in danger? Old. The Supreme Court found Lavallee not guilty of first degree of murder and ended the matter. There is no higher court to appeal toStep by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started