Ed negligently leaves his car in neutral, causing it to roll down his driveway and bump into Karl. The next day, Karl is pitching for his baseball team, and a bruise on his arm where Ed's car bumped into him causes him to throw the baseball wrong. The baseball hits an onlooker and severely damages her eye. She sues Ed, alleging that his negligence with the car resulted in her eye injury. Which of the following is Ed's best argument for why the onlooker shouldnotrecover?

The onlooker suffered no damages

Ed did not breach a duty in leaving his car in neutral

Ed's negligence was not the actual cause of the onlooker's injury

Ed's negligence was not the proximate cause of the onlooker's injury