Egbert Oil runs a pipeline from the Gulf of Mexico into the Rocky Mountain region. On June 15th, the pipeline ruptured, spewing thousands of gallons of oil into the farmlands of eastern Colorado. The Colorado Environmental Agency ("CEA") immediately mobilized to contain the spill and generated thousands of pages of mandated reports describing the spill and the damage done to the farmland. The CEA had never before responded to an oil spill; its usual purview was dealing with forest fires and pollution from factories; however, its statutory mandate included a requirement that it records and remediates any damage from oil spills. Dozens of landowners in Colorado are now suing Egbert, seeking restitution for the damage to their property. As part of their case, they are offering the CEA reports proving the damage that was done to the land. Egbert objects to these reports as hearsay. Are the reports admissible? Group of answer choices No, because it is not a regularly conducted activity of the CEA. No, unless the specific employees who made the records testify to their authenticity. No, because the CEA employees who made the reports were not experts. Yes, they are admissible as public records