Question
ELECTIVE PAPER 6D: ECONOMIC LAWS CASE STUDY 1 Mr.BhanuPratapTanejaisaleadingDelhi-basedrealestatedeveloper.Overthelastdecade,GarvitBhoomiDevelopersCompanyPvt.FourhousingprojectsweresuccessfullyestablishedbyLimited,withitsregisteredofficeinBhikajiCamaPlace,NewDelhi,twoinGurgaonandoneeachinJaipurandLucknow.Theyhadarobustleadershipteam. AnotherprojectinIndirapuram,UP,calledOmegaCapetownResidency,waslaunchedatthebeginningof2015inwhich1000residentialunitsconsistingof2BHKand3BHKapartmentsweretobebuilt.ByJanuary2018,theyshouldbecompletedinallrespectsandshippedtocustomersbythatdate.WhentheRealEstate(RegulationandDev)wasintroduced,thisprojectwascarriedoutsmoothly. As the application for registration was found to be complete in all respects, the Omega
ELECTIVE PAPER 6D: ECONOMIC LAWS CASE STUDY 1
Mr.BhanuPratapTanejaisaleadingDelhi-basedrealestatedeveloper.Overthelastdecade,GarvitBhoomiDevelopersCompanyPvt.FourhousingprojectsweresuccessfullyestablishedbyLimited,withitsregisteredofficeinBhikajiCamaPlace,NewDelhi,twoinGurgaonandoneeachinJaipurandLucknow.Theyhadarobustleadershipteam.
AnotherprojectinIndirapuram,UP,calledOmegaCapetownResidency,waslaunchedatthebeginningof2015inwhich1000residentialunitsconsistingof2BHKand3BHKapartmentsweretobebuilt.ByJanuary2018,theyshouldbecompletedinallrespectsandshippedtocustomersbythatdate.WhentheRealEstate(RegulationandDev)wasintroduced,thisprojectwascarriedoutsmoothly.
As the application for registration was found to be complete in all respects, the Omega Capetown Residency Project was granted registration by RERA (UP) within the statutory period and was provided with a registration number including alog-inID for assessing the website of the Authority and to create webpage.
In the meantime, Mr. Taneja was approached by some of the influential developers that an understanding had been reached among them to control the price of apartments to be built by them. However, because of legal tangles such understanding could not be brought into writing and it was also not intended to be enforced by legal proceedings. Mr. Taneja did not agree to the proposal because even though the understanding was not in writing and it was not intended to be enforceable by legal proceedings, it was still illegal as per the Competition Act, 2002. This revelation made by Mr. Taneja discouraged the intending developers and they desisted from being a party to this proposal.
Mr. Taneja's son Garvit, who was a commerce graduate and holder of law degree, had a college friend Rohit whose father Mr. Dev Kumar dealt in sale, purchase and renting of properties under the title 'Dev Property Dealers' from the Yusuf Sarai market. Since Rohit had joined his father's business, it was thought prudent to convert the existing proprietary business into a registered partnership firm titled as 'Dev & Sons Property Dealers'. Because of the enactment of Real Estate Act, Rohit consulted his friend Garvit regarding its implications in case of real estate agents. Accordingly, the firm was got registered as real estate agent with the help of Garvit's legal advisor.
Inaddition,GarvitproposedtoRohitandhisfatherthattheybeabletoaffiliatethemselveswithhisOmegaCapetownResidency,aregisteredIndirapuramRERAprojecttoencouragethesellingofapartmentsthattheyreadilyapproved.Garvitalsowarnedthemthat,accordingtotheAct,theywerenotsupposedtopromotethesale/purchaseofanyplotsincetheirbusinesswasnowalicencedrealestateagent.
apartment or building in a real estate project being sold by the promoter in any planning area, if such project was not registered with RERA of the concerned State.
Furthermore,Garvit'slegaladvisortoldthemthatalicencedrealestateagentmustkeepandmaintainproperbooksofaccountsandotherappropriaterecords,asprovidedbySection10.Inaddition,suchanagentwouldnotbeinvolvedinanyunfairtradepractise,suchasmakingafalsestatementabouttheserviceshewouldprovide.Hewouldnotallowanyadstobereleasedeither.
Rohit had a friend Tarun whose father Dr. Sreenivas Sharma was a surgeon in a government hospital and was residing in a rented government flat in the hospital campus itself. He had an intense desire to have a luxurious flat of his own. Tarunhad joined IBM after doing MBA from IIFT, New Delhi. So, with the combined salary of both, they decided to buy a flat. Tarun contacted Rohit to help him in searching a suitable apartment for his family. In turn, Rohit informed him that one particular 3BHK flat at an ideal location was available in Omega Capetown Residency in Indirapuram as the original allottee had withdrawn from the scheme; otherwise the booking under this project was already full. Dr. Sharma got interested in theinformation and wentto the Omega Capetown Residency along with his family to see the concerned apartment. He liked its strategic location and gathered more information regarding sanctioned plan, layout plan along with the other specifications, etc. He then asked for stage-wise time schedule of completion of the project and also enquired regarding provision of water, sanitation and other amenities. Since, Rohit personally knew Garvit and his father Mr. Taneja - the promoters of the project - Dr. Sharma and his family had a lively and fruitful meeting with them. Subsequently, he and his son jointly entered into an agreement for sale with the promoters of the project and made payment of 75% of the cost of the apartment, while remaining 25% of the cost wasto be paid at the time when the apartments were ready for occupation.
A few months after booking the apartment, Dr. Sharma got a notice from the promoters of Omega Capetown Residency that due to unforeseen circumstances they were not in a position to complete the project and needed the allottees' consent for transferring of their majority rights and liabilities to another reputed developer M/s. Sai Developers Pvt. Limited of New Delhi. In case any of the allottees was not agreeable to this proposal he could get his money refunded. Since Dr. Sharma was very much attached to the location of the flat, he accepted the proposal after enquiring with Rohit and his father. He also learnt that 95% of the allottees had already given their written permission. Further, the Authority had given its written approval to the proposal for transfer and completion of Project by M/s. Sai Developers Pvt. Limited. Dr. Sharma was also assured by Mr. Bhanu Pratap Taneja, the erstwhile promoter with whom he had earlier interacted satisfactorily, that all the pending obligations would be fulfilled by the new developer and in no case the dateof completion of the project would be extended; otherwise it would attract penalty. It was also disclosed by Mr. Taneja that the new promoter would rectify any structural defect if it occurred within a period of five years from the date of handing over the possession of the apartments. Dr. Sharma, thus felt relieved.
M/s. Sai Developers completed the project on time and received Completion Certificate from the Competent Authority. As per the agreement for sale, Dr. Sharma made payment of the remaining 25% of the cost. Thereafter, he received Occupancy Certificate and took physical possession of the apartment well before two months since the allottees were supposed to take physical possession within statutory period of two months from the issue of Occupancy Certificate. He was also given other necessary documents and plans, including that ofcommon areas. Healsobecame a member of the RWA formed by the allottees. In the meantime, the promoter executed a registered conveyance deed in favour of each of the allottees along with the undivided proportionate title in the common areas to the RWA.
Multiple Choice Questions
Registration of a real estate project shall not be required -
where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed five hundred square meters or the number of apartments proposed to be developed does not exceed eight.
where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed five thousand square meters or the number of apartments proposed to be developed does not exceed eighty.
where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed two hundred fifty square meters or the number of apartments proposed to be developed does not exceed four.
where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed three hundred square meters or the number of apartments proposed to be developed does not exceed three.
Who is required to submita copy of dulyobtainedapprovals and commencement certificate for getting the project registered with RERA:
Allottee
Promoter
Real Estate Agent
None of the above
A registered real estate agent shall -
Facilitate the sale/purchase of any plot, apartment or building, being sold by the promoter in any planning area, which is registered withthe Authority;
maintain and preserve prescribed books of account, records and documents;
not involve himself in any unfair trade practices
All of the above.
The promoter is required to rectify any structural defect if it occurs within a period of ----- years from the date of handing over the possession of the apartments to allottees -
Two years
Three years
Four years
Five years
Registration of on-going project for which completion certificate is yet to be received is mandatory -
Yes, if the area of land (developed or to be developed) exceeds five hundred square meters or the number of apartments (developed or to be developed) exceeds eight.
No, irrespective of the area of land or the number of apartments
Can't say
None of the above
A real estate developer can leave the project mid-way by selling that project to another developer if he has taken a written approval of of allottees
along with approval of the Authority.
2/3rd
1/3rd
3/4th
1/4th
The time limit within which an allottee is required to take physical possession of the apartment after issue of occupancy certificate is -
one month
two months
three months
four months
A certificate certifying that the real estate project has been developed according to the sanctioned plan, layout plan and specifications as approved by the competent authority under the local laws is called -
Commencement Certificate
Completion Certificate
Occupancy Certificate
None of the above
The flat purchased by Dr. Sharma jointly with his wife Mrs. Neelima Sharma though funded by him would be held as 'benami transaction' under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 -
Yes
No
Can't say
None of the above
10 As per the Competition Act, 2002 'Agreement' includes any arrangement or understanding or action in concert:
Whether or not, such arrangement, understanding or action is formal or in writing; or
Whether or not such arrangement, understanding or actionis intended to be enforceable by legal proceedings.
Whether or not, such arrangement, understanding or action is formal or in writing; or whether or not such arrangement, understanding or action is intended to be enforceable by legal proceedings.
None of the above.
Descriptive Questions
(i)Examine the following given aspects with reference to the allottee inthe situation given in the case study :
Rights exercised by Dr. Sharma as an allottee.
Duties fulfilled by Dr. Sharma as an allottee.
Right which was not exercised by him and duty which was not required to be fulfilled by Dr. Sharma.
(ii)Thepromoters ofOmegaCapetownResidency transferred majority of rights and liabilities to Sai DeveIopers Pvt Ltd. for the completionof the project. Advise as to the validity of such transfer of a real estate project to a Sai Developer's Pvt Ltd in the case study?
In the given case study Omega Capetown Residency has got itself registered under the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, as it consisted of 1,000 residential units. However, if Omega Capetown Residency consisted of only 250 residential units, then was it necessary to get itself registered under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016: if yes, name the various important documents and declarations which are required to be submitted by a 'real estate developer' while registering a project with theReal Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) having only 250 residential units and not 1,000 residential units.
Mr. Bhanu Pratap Taneja was approached by some of the influential developers to join their association so as to reach an understanding whereby they could inflate the price of the apartments built by them. Even though the deal was in favour of Mr. Bhanu Pratap Taneja, he rejected the proposal from other developers. In the light of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, discuss whether the decision of Mr. Bhanu Pratap Taneja is lawful?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started