Ellery signs a contract to perform a custom paint job on Mercury's van. Mercury is not happy with the job, but pays the bill. For years, Mercury sees the van and he grows angrier and angrier because he does not like the paint job. Ten years after completion of the job, Mercury sues Ellery. Assume Michigan's six year statute of limitations applies. What result? Mercury's claim is barred because it is illegal to custom paint a van as it might cause consumer confusion. Mercury's claim is not barred because statutes of limitations are unconstitutional. Mercury's claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Mercury's claim is not barred because the problem was apparent from the beginning.

Ellery signs a contract to perform a custom paint job on Mercury's van. Mercury is not happy with the job, but pays the bill. For years, Mercury sees the van and he grows angrier and angrier because he does not like the paint job. Ten years after completion of the job, Mercury sues Ellery. Assume Michigan's six year statute of limitations applies. What result? Mercury's claim is barred because it is illegal to custom paint a van as it might cause consumer confusion. Mercury's claim is not barred because statutes of limitations are unconstitutional. Mercury's claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Mercury's claim is not barred because the problem was apparent from the beginning