EMPLOYEE PROTECTION AND WHISTLEBLOWING Conclusion The defendant is guilty of wrongfully dismissing the plaintiff for exposing the company's malicious dealings, for discrediting her opinions. Her privacy was, however, not invaded. Reaction I agree with the verdict delivered by the judge. She found the defendant guilty of wrongful termination but not a breach of privacy. She should also have pointed out that the plaintiff did not follow the right procedure of communicating her concerns to the legal department