Engineer A enters into a consulting contract with a client to provide design and construction supervision of road surfaces in a partially completed land development project. He has taken over from another consultant, who was discharged partway through the job. Before Engineer A can finish the project, his contract also is terminated. Shortly thereafter, it becomes obvious that there are deficiencies in the work done under A's supervision. Investigation shows that hastily paved road surfaces, completed under adverse late-fall weather conditions, are not up to specifications. It seems that A is aware of this. He intended to require remedial work by the contractor in the spring, but his termination occurred before that time Engineer A did not advise his client that he was expecting to re-inspect in the spring and to have deficiencies corrected, nor did he inform his client of the existing state of the roads after he was released from his contract. Did engineer A act in an ethical way in his dealings with his client, even though he may feel that he was unfairly terminated? Discuss the articles of the Code of Ethics that have a bearing on this case.