EQUIPOTENTIALS EXPERIMENT Answer the following questions below using complete sentences: 1. Were the mean electric field magnitudes for either ink pattern monotonic? If so, was it monotonic increasing or monotonic decreasing? 2. Overall, were you mean electric field magnitudes precise or imprecise for the Parallel-Plate pattern? Justify your conclusion. 3. Overall, were you mean electric field magnitudes precise or imprecise for the second ink pattern? Justify your conclusion. 4. Were the equipotential surfaces for the two ink patterns identical? Should they have been? 5. Identify the independent variable(s) for this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary. 6. Fixed variables are qualities and/or quantities that are held constant throughout the entire experiment. Identify the fixed variable(s) in this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary. 7. Identify the dependent variable(s) for this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary.EQUIPOTENTAILS EXPERIMENT EQUIPOTENTAILS EXPERIMENT L Calculations Table of Results - Parallel-Plate Ink Pattern Parallel-Plate Pattern - 1.000 V AND 0 V Equipotential Surfaces MEAN ELECTRIC FIELD MAGNITUDE EQUIPOTENTIAL Mean Electric Field Magnitude SURFACES Eavg + AE (N/C) V2 - V1 Eavg Ar 1.000 V and O V 84.75+0.2 1.000V - 0.000V Eavg 0.01180m 2.000 V and 1.000 V 76.92+0.2 3.000 V and 2.000 V 70.92+0.2 Electric Field Magnitude Percent Uncertainty 4.000 V and 3.000 V 78.37+0.2 AE = SV2 S(Ar) TAVI + ( + X 100% Ar 5.00 V and 4.000 V 104+0.3 0.001V\\2 + 0.00002my AE = + 1 (0.001V\\2 1V X 100% 1V 0.01180 Table of Results - Second Ink Pattern MEAN ELECTRIC FIELD MAGNITUDE EQUIPOTENTIAL SURFACES Favg 1 48 (N/C) 1.000 V and O V 70.13+0.2 2.000 V and 1.000 V 36.63+0.2 3.000 V and 2.000 V 28.25+0.2 4.000 V and 3.000 V 37.34+0.2 5.00 V and 4.000 V 66.23+0.2Data Table Parallel Plates Ink Pattern DISTANCE Err i Mar] ( em :1 1.000 V and 0 F 1.130i0.002 2.000 la' and 1.000 V 1,300+ 002 EQUIPDTENTIAL SURFACES 3.000 V and 2.000 V 1 410i0.002 4.000 V and 3.000 V 1.22E+0 002 5.00 If and 4.000 Ir' 0.960 i0.002 Data Table Second Ink Pattern DISTANCE r i 5(r] ( em ] 1.000 V and 0 F 1.426i0 002 2.000 If and 1.000 V 12304-0 002 EUlPDTENTIAL SURFACES 4.000 Ia' and 3.000 F 2.02E+0 002 3.000 If and 2.000 F 3 540i0.002 5.00 V and 4.000 If 1.510i0.002 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + -+ + + + + 8- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4V + + + + + + + + + + + + + 8- + + + + + + + + +/ + + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + A+ + + + + + 8- + + + + + +- + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + 8- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +. + + + + + + + + + + + -- +- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 7 + + + + + + + + + + + + .+ + + + + + BACK LINE MASTER OF THE GRID PATTERN ON PASCO SCIENTIFIC MODEL PR-1024 CONDUCTIVE PAPER. F + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -+ -+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + *- + + + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + + + + + + + -+ + + +