Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Equity and Trusts: Resulting Trusts 1. Comment on the decision in Re Abbot by briefly explaining the facts and explaining why the remainder of the
Equity and Trusts: Resulting Trusts 1. Comment on the decision in Re Abbot by briefly explaining the facts and explaining why the remainder of the fund was not held to belong to the estate of the two intended beneficiaries. 2. Comment on the decision in Re Andrews and explain why the result in that case was different from the result in Re Abbott. 3. Comment on Re Osoba with special reference to the principles by which court was guided in deciding that the daughter was entitled to keep the surplus in the trust fund. (This case deals with a few other issues: steer clear of them. Concentrate on whether the surplus should go on a resulting trust to the estate of the settlor or should remain with the daughter as 4. What differences do you see between the relevant legal principles in the Gillingham case and West Sussex case
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started