eric is the owner of a chain of clothing stores. he hires tamika to be the manger of a new Store which is to open in Long Beach California Eric by written contract agrees to pay to make up a monthly salary and 15% of all profits without Eric's knowledge TaMika represents to Norton as Eric's partner showing Norton the agreement to share all profits and extend credit Tamika Tamika defaults discuss whether in North and can hold Eric liable as a partner explain why or why not

This is a graded discussion: 10 points possible due Jul 5 at 11pm Discussion Forum #5 77 Eric is the owner of a chain of clothing stores. He hires Tameka to be the manager of a new store, which is to open in Long Beach, CA. Eric, by written contract, agrees to pay Tameka a monthly salary and 15% of all profits. Without Eric's knowledge, Tameka represents to Norzin as Eric's partner, showing Norzin the agreement to share all profits. Norzin extends credit to Tameka. Tameka defaults. Discuss whether Norzin can hold Eric liable as a partner? Explain why or why not