Ernest Price went to a doctor in 1997, seeking Oxycontin to treat pain related to sickle cell anemia. Between November 1999 and October 2000, Price sought Oxycontin prescriptions from at least ten different doctors at ten different clinics in two cities, filling the prescriptions at seven pharmacies in three cities. The doctors were notified of Price's medicationseeking behavior, and the doctors discontinued Price's treatment. Price then filed suit, claiming his doctors, pharmacies, and the pharmaceutical companies that manufactured Oxycontin had breached their duty by failing to adequately warn Price of the addictive nature of Oxycontin. How do you think the court responded to Price's claims? Think about all the stakeholders involved in such a case; how would those parties be affected by a ruling in favor of Price? In favor of the doctors and pharmaceutical companies? [Ernest Price v. The Purdue Pharma Co., 920 So. 2d 479; 2006 Miss. LEXIS 67 (2006).]

Help me to get the answer to this questions

Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant

Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.

Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties).

Provide a judgment on who should win the case - be clear.

-Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.