Every investment is made with an assumption about future benefits (i.e., future cash in-flows).We have learned about lump-sum cash flows, annuities and perpetuities.If we were able to look at Starbuck's estimate of future cash in-flows associated with this investment, what do you think you would see: 1) a single lump-sum cash in-flow at some point in the future; 2) cash flows which reflect an annuity; 3) cash flows which look like a perpetuity; or, 4) some combination of all of these?Please explain -- i.e., provide some rationale for your answer recognizing that all of us are making an educated guess about what benefits Starbucks is forecasting.