Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Example 18. Consider two firms competing in quantities (a la Cournot), facing linear inverse demand p(Q) = 100-Q, where Q = q1 + q2 denotes
Example 18. Consider two firms competing in quantities (a la Cournot), facing linear inverse demand p(Q) = 100-Q, where Q = q1 + q2 denotes aggregate output For simplicity, assume that firms face a common marginal cost of production c 10 Unrepeated game. Find the equilibrium output each firm produces when competing a la Cournot (that is, when they simultaneously and independently choose their output levels) in the unrepeated version of the game (that is, when firms interact only once). In addition, find the profits that each firm earns in equilibrium. a) b) Repeated game - Collusion. Assume now that the CEOs from both companies meet to discuss a collusive agreement that would increase their profits. Set up the maximization problem that firms solve when maximizing their joint profits (that is, the sum of profits for both firms). Find the output level that each firm should select to maximize joint profits. In addition, find the profits that each firm obtains in this collusive agreement Repeated game starts colluding in period 1, and it keeps doing so as long as both firms colluded in the past. Otherwise, every firm deviates to the Cournot equilibrium thereafter (that is, every firm produces the Nash equilibrium of the unrepeated game found in part a forever). In words, this says that the punishment of deviating from the collusive agreement is permanent, since firms never return to the collusive outcome. For which discount factors this grim-trigger strategy can be sustained as the SPNE of the infinitely-repeated game? c) Permament punishment. Consider a grim-trigger strategy in which every firm d) Repeated game - Temporary punishment. Consider now a "modified" grim-trigger strategy. Like in the grim-trigger strategy of part (c), every firm starts colluding in period 1, and it keeps doing so as long as both firms colluded in the past. However, if a deviation is detected by either firm, every firm deviates to the Cournot equilibrium during only 1 period, and then every firm returns to cooperation (producing the collusive output). Intuitively, this implies that the punishment of deviating from the collusive agreement is now temporary (rather than permanent) since it lasts only one period. For which discount factors this "modified" grim-trigger strategy can be sustained as the SPNE of the infinitely-repeated game? Consider again the temporary punishment in part (d) but assume now that it lasts for two periods How are your results from part (d) affected? Interpret Consider again the temporary punishment in part (d) but assume now that it lasts for three periods. How are your results from part (d) affected? Interpret e) f)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started