Explain a critical review of the following article and answer the following questions

Article:

Mindfulness Can Make You Happy and Productive A Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Its Effects on Happiness, Work Engagement, and Performance.pdf Mindfulness Can Make You Happy and Productive A Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Its Effects on Happiness, work commitment and performance.pdf - Alternative Formats

Coo, C. and Salanova, M. (2018). Mindfulness can make you happy and productive: A controlled trial of mindfulness and its effects on happiness, work engagement, and performance. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(6), 1691-1711.

Where: Where did this article/webpage appear? Is this reasonable? Is the publishing entity respectable/responsible?

This requires you to do a little research on the magazine itself. Is Psychology & Marketing a reputable journal? Where you get your information is critical when supporting your argument. That's why your instructors here will tell you not to use Wikepedia (which can be edited by anyone) and blogs (which are usually mostly opinion). Even WebMD does not have a good reputation as some of its content is influenced by its sponsors.

Who: Who wrote/published the article/webpage? What are your credentials? Are the credentials appropriate for your argument?

Who are the authors? Are they qualified to investigate this? For example, do they have a PhD?

When: Is this information current? If so, do you think it will stand the "test of time"? If not, is it outdated or classic?

Items have a useful life. When writing about this topic, you want current information and this article is 17 years old. It would behoove you to see if this measure has been written about since this article. Are they still validating it? Using it?

What: What argument is/are the author(s) making? It is logical? Based on what you know, is it reasonable? What evidence is given to support the argument? Can you think of evidence to disprove it?

This article is about creating a measure. What would be the purpose of using a measure to quantify active empathic listening?

How: How was supporting/refuting evidence collected? Is this credible? What type of evidence do you think needs to be collected to prove the argument? Did the author(s) do this?

Summarize the quality of the item (it doesn't have to be a "good" item in your opinion), and whether you think this is a valuable and trustworthy item. Did you think I was biased? Could the author have underlying motives? How about? It is valid?