Explain whether or not a warrant is appropriate for a search, and why?

Scenarios are as follows:

A string of burglaries that targeted expensive properties startled the calm suburban community of Willow Creek. The case's detective, Sarah Miller, got a tip from an informant speculating that Marcus Reed, a local, could have been involved in the break-ins. Despite having no obvious source of income, Marcus was well-known for living a luxurious lifestyle. Detective Miller found that Marcus had recently bought pricey jewelry that matched things that were reported stolen in the burglaries after doing more investigation. Marcus was also seen selling additional expensive products that were probably stolen in security footage from a nearby business. Detective Miller requested a search warrant in order to conduct a raid on Marcus's home due to growing evidence against him. Marcus can be seen selling stolen products via surveillance film. Testimony from a source linking Marcus to the break-ins. Records show that Marcus bought pricey jewelry that matched the stolen goods. There have been suspicious activities at Marcus's home, including regular visits from acquaintances with a criminal history. The case was assigned to Detective Sarah Miller. Marcus Reed, the person thought to be responsible for the break-ins. a reliable source offering important details on Marcus's participation. Associates of Marcus, potentially involved in illegal acts. Detective Miller's evidence, which includes surveillance footage, witness accounts, and suspicious behavior, creates a reasonable suspicion that Marcus's home is the source of stolen goods or proof of criminal conduct. Law enforcement personnel are guaranteed to uphold the constitutional prohibitions on arbitrary searches and seizures by obtaining a search warrant. It protects the rights of both suspects and innocent people during the investigation process by offering monitoring and accountability. Marcus's home may be thoroughly searched by law enforcement officials with a search warrant, protecting any possible evidence of the burglaries. This contains evidence of illicit transactions, stolen goods, and other damning documents.

An increasing number of violent muggings in the growing city of Riverside have made many uneasy. A tip from a confidential informant linked known gang member Carlos Ramirez to the thefts, which alerted Detective James Anderson, the main investigator, to the case. The perpetrator of one of the muggings was identified by eyewitnesses after Carlos was seen in security film near the site. Following up on the leads, it was discovered that Carlos was well-known to associate with other members of his gang, the Crimson Serpents, and had a history of similar charges. Additionally, Carlos was present at the scene of other mugging events according to cell phone data that Detective Anderson was able to collect. Carlos is shown in surveillance film close to the location of one of the muggings. According to eyewitness accounts, Carlos was the one who did it.Carlos's past criminal history for related charges. Records from Carlos's cell phone show that he was present at many mugging occurrences. Details originating from a private source linking Carlos to the heists. Leading the inquiry is Detective James Anderson. Carlos Ramirez, the person suspected of being responsible for the muggings. Important details on Carlos's involvement are provided by a confidential source. Witnesses who recognized Carlos as the offender. There is reasonable suspicion that Carlos committed the muggings based on the evidence that Detective Anderson acquired, which includes cell phone records, eyewitness accounts, surveillance film, and information from a confidential informant. Because of the facts presented, it is fair to assume that Carlos has committed crimes, which justifies his arrest. Getting an arrest warrant guarantees that police follow the constitutional prohibitions on making arbitrary arrests. It protects suspects' rights and stops erroneous arrests by requiring court assessment and permission based on evidence of reasonable cause. By obtaining an arrest warrant and taking Carlos off the streets, law enforcement can lessen the likelihood that the community will suffer more damage. Additionally, it strengthens public safety and faith in the legal system by sending a clear message that illegal activity will not be condoned.