Explain whether or not an entrenched 'bill of rights' is desirable? Does an entrenched 'bill of rights' promote the central principles of both liberalism and democracy? If so, how does it accomplish that end? If not, explain how an entrenched "bill of rights" can threaten a liberal-democracy.

• (Provide at least one case example from above or our text to support your argument.)

• Case references

1) Carter v. Canada (Attorney General)

2) Canada v. Bedford