Explanation for relevance needs to provide examples from the article to illustrate theories and/or principles from your
Question:
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/6674295c32ff2_7966674295c1cd08.jpg)
Explanation for relevance needs to provide examples from the article to illustrate theories and/or principles from your chosen Topics. It is important to provide evidence (facts) from the articles to support any opinion and arguments you express; perhaps facts illustrate certain terms you learn in topics; maybe it need to recognise that the findings are only applicable in a certain context; or the interpretation of the facts illustrate a certain theoretical lens (or approach). This DOES NOT mean summarise the article, summarise the topics or define the theories.
Needs Personal reflection part for each contribution needs to explain what you found to be the aspect of the chosen topics that created the most reaction from you (biggest impact on your learning ... something you realised or now feel you understand more clearly). For example, you may not have thought about the issue before; you may have observed behaviour related to the matter before and that was important to you; you may have related the issue to a current development in the world - current affairs, your employment or business, etc. This is subjective and personal reflection that will differ from student to student. This DOES NOT mean making recommendations about what you think the authors might have said/done.
Please include a link (URL) to the article or attach a PDF copy in your post & the full reference.
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/6674295c8487d_7966674295c729cb.jpg)