Question
Explique por favor en qu casos una corte deber seguir su precedente legal mandatorio y cuando est en la obligacin de cambiar su precedente y
Explique por favor en qu casos una corte deber seguir su precedente legal mandatorio y cuando est en la obligacin de cambiar su precedente y actualizar su standard sobre el caso en discusin.
Ejemplo: Si el tribunal supremo del estado A define "imprudente" como se utiliza en el estatuto de homicidio imprudente del estado, entonces todos los tribunales inferiores del estado A (tribunales intermedios de apelacin y de primera instancia) estn obligados a seguir el tribunal supremo y aplicar su interpretacin de la sentencia. plazo en los casos que involucran el estatuto.
Con respecto a este ejemplo, est obligado el tribunal ms alto del estado A, en casos posteriores, a seguir su propia definicin anterior de "imprudente"?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please explain in which cases a court must follow its mandatory legal precedent and when it is obliged to change its precedent and update its standard on the case under discussion.
Example: If the Supreme Court in State A defines "reckless" as used in the state's reckless homicide statute, then all lower courts in State A (intermediate appellate and trial courts) are required to follow the Supreme Court and apply their interpretation of the sentenceterm in cases involving the statute.
With respect to this example, is State A's highest court obligated, in subsequent cases, to follow its own prior definition of "reckless"?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started