the managers to ensure that Wheaton got the shelf it wanted in each Store. While visiting a Storc in Springfield, Illinois, Johnson chatted for a few minutes uith the manager. Who got phone call that his Wife was in auto accident while on her way to pick up the manager at the Store. While the Wife Was seriously injL"ed. Johnson to take the manager to thc scene of thc accident, and the manager accepted. On the way' to the accident Scene. Johnson negligently a light. resulting in his car being struck hy another car. The grocery store manager received a broken leg' part Eight no serious health to humans When as directed. The written purchase contract that Scotts sigm with does represent that NO BUGGZ has no health risks to the Contract contains an exculpatory Clause Staung that Bauer is ncX by Accent Pointe's representations. unless tray also appear thc Written contract TWO years after Scotts buys NO BUGGZ, Scotts is subjcctm to consumer lewsuits ing that NO BLIGGZ is causing health problems its users. Is Bauer liable to Sets for misrepresentation ? 12. Thule Drilling sued Jacob Schimberg based ness transactions between Thule and QGM Group, for Which Schimberg CEO, the doctrine Of mspondtu' is Dean Wit- ter liable actions Miguel? (Hint: Think about whether Miguel's actions were witbig scope Of authority as a broker) Tammy Bauer hires consulting Irm Accent Pointe to find a for the and of her repellent. NO Bt.JGGZ Bauer tells Accent pointe to tell prospective buyers thai NO BUGGZ is organic and no health risks knows that NO BtJGGZ has serious negative health effects on hu- mans en when used as directed. Consequently. Ac cent Pointe Company that NO BLIGGZ has Agency Crntraet With QGM required to do and construction Work on three drilling rigs. Thule agreed to loan QGM funds that QGM's mrk on the rigs could be com Thule alleged that QGM breached the contra with Thule and that Thule WAS enticed to take POSS Sion Of the rigs, Thule also argued that Schimberg. the cornrate agent of QGM. was personally liable Thule because he directly denied Thule access to rigs, committing the tort of Schimb argued that he acted only at the behest of his QC superiors and that he was a patty to any of contracts Thule and QGM. Are and Schimberg liablc to Thule?