Fact Scencario Geddy Construction (GC) was planning to bid a highway project in Ada, Oklahoma. The bid documents contained a standard site inspection clause advising bidders to become generally familiar with the site and include in their proposals all costs resulting from conditions observable at the site. The project manual (spec book) included boring logs indicating that no rock would be encountered at the design elevations. GC had ample opportunity prior to bid to visit the site or to conduct its own subsurface exploration, but declined to do so. Nevertheless, GC submitted a bid and was awarded the contract. Early in the project, GC encountered massive quantities of rock in those areas in which the boring logs indicated there was none. Question In deciding whether a Type I or Type II changed condition might exist, which of the following is correct: Group of answer choices By ignoring his responsibility to conduct a site investigation and declining to conduct his own subsurface investigation, GC waived any right to complain about the condition, regardless of the type. if the spec book containing the boring logs, which showed no rock, was made a part of the contract documents, it is possible that a Type II changed condition exists because of the apparent conflict between what is shown in the contract documents versus what was actually encountered at the site. If the boring logs were made a part of the contract documents, it is possible that a Type I changed condition exists because of the apparent conflict between what is shown in the contract documents versus what was actually encountered at the site. Since GC did not visit the site prior to bidding the work, it is impossible to prove a Type Il changed condition exists, therefore, it must be a Type I changed condition