Fact Scencario Geddy Construction (GC) was planning to bid a highway project in Ada, Oklahoma. The bid documents contained a standard site inspection clause advising bidders to become generally familiar with the site and include in their proposals all costs resulting from conditions observable at the site. The project manual (spec book) included boring logs indicating that no rock would be encountered at the design elevations. GC had ample opportunity prior to bid to visit the site or to conduct its own subsurface exploration, but declined to do so. Nevertheless, GC submitted a bid and was awarded the contract. Early in the project, GC encountered massive quantities of rock in those areas in which the boring logs indicated there was none. Question In a jurisdiction that still follows the privity rule, would GC have the right to sue the geotechnical engineer who prepared the erroneous soils report? Group of answer choices Yes No ' (Ctr)