Fact:Any fact that is NOT presented or introduced here should NOT be used in the following sections.

Issue: Please start with "Whether ... " and general terms to describe parties, .... and also contain some substance of the law or rule, not just a citation number.

Applicable Law/Rule: Please provide the rule or law in its nuances word by word, NOT just a citation number.

Analysis:Please compare the facts with the rule/law to answer the question raised in the issue statement.

Conclusion: Please restate the issue statement without "whether" in an affirmative or disaffirmative manner.

Please also use and follow the guideline for case analysis.

Hints:1.Is FBI a state actor?Can a state actor compel a publicly listed company to do certain things?Under Federal law or state law?etc.

2.Standards of Review. Whenever an issue touches a fundamental right protected under the Constitution, the court system will apply the standard of strict scrutiny, i.e. a state actor has the burden of proof in the legal process at all levels of our court system. In most cases, the state actor will not prevail because of this high "hurdle"-- a guarding device to our fundamental rights

https://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/29/apple-vs-fbi-all-you-need-to-know.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/two-iphones-or-privacy-billions-why-apple-vs-fbi-matters-n1118001