Factor Information Factor Type Levels Values Bait Fixed 3 Chemical, Scent, Sugar Location Fixed 4 Ground, Lower, Middle, Top Analysis of Variance for Moths Source DF MS F Bait 2 1130 56.52 0.89 0.416 Location 3 1981.4 660.46 10.45 0.000 Bait* Location 6 1150 19.16 0.30 0.932 Error 48 3033.6 63.20 Total 59 5243.0 Model Summary 5 R-sq R-sqladj) 7.94984 42.14% Residual Plots for Moths Normal Probability Plot Versus Fits 95.9 98 90 Residual Percent 50 10 20 -10 10 15 25 30 35 Residual Fitted Value Histogram Versus Order 12 Residual Frequency B -70 16 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Residual Observation OrderInteraction Plot for Moths Interaction Plot for Moths Data Means Location Ground 35 Lower Middle Top 30 Mean 25 20 15- Chemical Scent Sugar Bait\"we looked at a stud};r to determine if the bait used in a trap {using scent. sugar. or a chemical] inuenced the number of spruce moths that are caught in the trap. As a part of that study, researchers also wondered if the location of the trap in a tree {top branches, middle branches. lower branches; or at the ground} influenced the number of sance moths caught in a trap. The researchers used t] traps [all the same brand] and randomlyr assigned them to the different baitlocation combinations. At the 5% signicance level; can you conclude that Bait and Location interact in their effect on mean number of spruce moths caught? Use the Minitab output posted on Moodle and follow the steps below to answer this question. What is the response variable? List the factors (explanatory variables) and name the levels of each factor: A * B IE How many treatment groups are there? Answer:Which of the following are the correct hypotheses for this question? Select one: O a. Ho: There is an interaction effect between Bait and Location on the mean number of spruce moths caught in the trap for this population model of spruce moths. Ha: There is no interaction effect between Bait and Location on the mean number of spruce moths caught in the trap for this population model of spruce moths. O b. Ho: There is no interaction effect between Bait and Location on the mean number of spruce moths caught in the trap for this population model of spruce moths. Ha: There is an interaction effect between Bait and Location on the mean number of spruce moths caught in the trap for this population model of spruce moths. O c. Ho: There is no difference in mean number of spruce moths caught in the trap between Bait and Location for this population model of spruce moths. Ha: There is a difference in mean number of spruce moths caught in the trap between Bait and Location for this population model of spruce moths. O d. Ho: There is a difference in mean number of spruce moths caught in the trap between Bait and Location for this population model of spruce moths. Ha: There is no difference in mean number of spruce moths caught in the trap between Bait and Location for this population model of spruce moths.Which of the following is the correct assessment of the significance of the evidence? Select one: O a. 0.932 > 0.05, reject Ho. O b. 0.932 > 0.05, do not reject Ho. O c. 0.932 > 0.05, conclude Ho. O d. 0.932 > 0.05, conclude Ha. State your conclusion in the context of the problem. 7 A v B I E PA