Factual Analysis - Agency X Est. Length: 4:00:00 Tufazzul Hoque Bhuiyan: Attempt 1 Page 1 Use the template we discussed in class to prepare your factual analysis of the case. Case Name: PI v Def. Issue: Area of law and remedy sought, Reasoning: discuss what the plaintiff has to argue and any possible defences. State what you think may be the outcome. Risk Reduction: one suggestion for each of the plaintiff and defendant. Question 1 (15 points) Saved The facts of this case are as follows: Winter was coming early in the BC Rocky Mountain area and it was good news for Debbie Sousa, dba Snow Be Gone. She had just purchased a second truck for her snow removal business in Cranbrook, and a longer season would help her to generate more revenue. When she bought the second truck, her brother who owned a similar business in Nelson suggested she hire a sales manager to make sure she had enough contracts to cover the new costs. She took his advice and hired a sales manager, Dan Gray, who promised he could help grow the business. However, when Sousa returned to the office one day, she was alarmed to discover that Gray committed her to a contract with Dan Newton, to clear several new driveways in his subdivision in Fernie, over an hour away. Newton was upset when Sousa failed to clear the driveways and wanted to sue Sousa as he had to hire another company, at a greater cost to complete the snow removal. Paragraph BIU Case Name: Issue: Reasoning Risk Reduction