Find the case of Morrison v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company, 1999 (November) ABCA through the CanLll site. Which one of the following statements regarding this case is FALSE? Question 17 Select one: a. The Alberta Court of Appeal held that the trial judge considered both subjective and objectives factors in finding in favour of the insured. cross out b. The Alberta Court of Appeal held that the test to determine material misrepresentation is a subjective/objective test - i.e. how would a reasonable person respond to the insurance company's question in similar circumstances? cross out c. The insured did not disclose that he was legally blind in one eye, as he was afraid that his application for