FireEye obviously wanted to be on the winning side of the competition. But, what could it do to get

there? Could an all$-$automated, AI machine$-$driven approach be the answer? Or was its existing

approach, a symbiosis of human capability and AI$-$enabled machine support, the right way forward?

Or possibly the only viable way forward? Or$,$ were both these approaches suitable simultaneously $-$

across every point on the automatability spectrum and in between, depending on the nature of the

game the protectors were encountering with the attackers?