First, Amy's rent-to-own contract for the Alpo Theater Model XL2 could fall under the unconscionability concept in contract law. The unconscionability concept could come to pass in the following ways: 1. Procedural Unconscionability: This looks at how the contract was formed. This might be applicable if Amy had been rushed, misinformed, or was unable to comprehend the contract in full. 2. Substantive Unconscionability: This looks at the terms of the contract. If Amy were to pay a sum of $3,000 across the life of the contract for a single item that is worth $1,000, it brings forward a glaring, potentially unfair disparity in price. The excessive cost difference suggests substantive unconscionability. Where either form of unconscionability is found, i.e., great overpricing, the court might refuse to enforce the contract. On the other hand, such are specific details for a case-to-case decision: state laws and the discretion of the court. Amy should seek legal advice for a detailed assessment