First part of the question: In a hospital, there are five patients that need healthy organs. A doctor decides to kill a random healthy person in the waiting room, take the five organs needed, and give them to the five patients waiting for healthy organs. One person gets hurt, but five people get helped. Does utilitarianism demand that the doctor kill the one to save the five? Why or why not? Give me your answer in a few sentences. Second part of the question: What might a Kantian ethicist say about this same case