First, please read the facts carefully and identify all possible legal issues in the case. For example, Party A did XXX which will lead to YYY, thus Party A may lose the case because...// the case have a misrepresentation issue since Party A did Xx that lead Party B think Yy, then it cause B to making decision on Zz.

Secondly, do the identification the legal issues for each of the party involve. (Note: please do focus on issue spotting).

Lastly, argue further and give an example on if a factor change what the result would be for example, "Who would win the lawsuit (and why) if A, instead of acting as she did in the problem, [failed to send the notice] [wrote B urging her to perform] [never responded] [whatever]?" (Note: you may change the factor in any way you want.

Hypo facts are vague which for the purpose for you to change it, for example you may say "if the system instead on date X the warranty still works and Party A have legal stand to ask for remedy - law says party may require remedy"

HYPO 7

Plaintiff purchased an automobile from defendant. Several days prior to purchasing it, plaintiff made avisual inspection and drove the vehicle on a road test. Plaintiff testified that she asked defendant'ssalesperson whether the car had ever been involved in a car accident, and the salesperson said no even though the salesperson honestly had no idea whether the car had been wrecked. To reassure plaintiff, defendant advised plaintiff that she could have the car inspected by any mechanic or automotive specialist of her choice. Plaintiff did not follow the advice, but it was clear to plaintiff that the right rear quarter panel of the car had been repaired and painted.

Plaintiff purchased the vehicle for the sum of $33,181.00. Plaintiff paid $5,000 down, and Defendantagreed to finance the balance of the purchase price. The parties signed a standard-form, thoroughly detailed installment sales contract that contained a merger clause and a statement acknowledging that the vehicle was being sold "as is," without a warranty.

Two months after purchasing the vehicle, Plaintiff took the car to an automobile body repair person, who advised plaintiff that the vehicle had been substantially damaged on its right side and that it would cost approximately $5,500 to satisfactorily repair the vehicle. Plaintiff thereupon immediately returned the vehicle to defendant's premises and demanded a refund of her purchase price. When defendant refused, plaintiff took an Uber home and later filed suit against defendant who denied liability and counterclaimed.