first , select a financial crime case. It must be connected to a Financial Institution. It can be related to Money Laundering, Sanctions, Bribery & Corruption. It can also be a case about a Cybercrime related to financial crime or something Crypto related.

Second provide a synopsis of the case study. Include the link to the source of your information.

Part A: .

1. List and explain the red flags. Are there any surprises? Does anything stand out that should have alerted authorities (bank or otherwise) sooner? Why? Why not? Explain.

2. Discuss how and what evidence was gathered. What are the sources of the evidence? How was it gathered? Is there a paper trail? Could the evidence gathering have been done better? Why? Why not? Explain.

Part B:

1. Explain what due diligence activities took place or should have taken place by the FI

2. Could something have been done sooner or differently that could have prevented this crime and/or activity from taking place? If so, what? How? Explain your rationale.

Part C:

Was there international involvement and collaboration? Explain what importance the international collaboration played in this case. If there wasnt any international involvement, should there have been? Would it have made a difference? Why or why not?

Part D:

Summarize the outcome. How was the case made? Generally speaking, what could have been done better. Summarize your findings

please mention all the links you use.