fitness World Pty Ltd is a newly based internet sport's agency providing elite sport tours. Sam, Chris and John are three directors of the company. Sam recently represented the company at a marketing seminar in London. During the seminar she was introduced to a potential client with a very lucrative contract offering sport tours into Australia. Sam distanced herself from Fitness World Pty Ltd and advised that Fitness World Pty Ltd would not have the capacity to take on the contract. Sam then put forward her family company Sam's World Pty Ltd as a service provider who could deliver on the contract. Chris and John discovered what Sam had done. Provide advice on the rights Sports World Pty Ltd have against Sam. PART B Michael, John and Sam are the directors of the MJS Pop Up Pty Ltd. The company's constitution provides that the minimum quorum for a directors' meeting is two. Late one evening, Michael and John have a discussion over dinner at a restaurant and they decide that MJS Pop Up Pty Ltd should set up a franchise business model. Michael had sent Sam a text message just before the meeting to advise that they were going to discuss a major potential opportunity and asked whether she wanted to join them, but she said no because it was late at night. The next morning John instructs the company's solicitors to draw up a franchise agreement. No further discussion with Sam takes place, as John believes that he and Michael have made a valid decision as the company over dinner. Is John correct that valid meeting has been held? Could s 1322 be used to address any issues?