Five years old Cheyenne stark was riding in the backseat of her parents ford tarus. Cheyenne was not sitting in a booster seat. Instead, she was using a seatbelt designed by ford ,but was wearing the shoulder belt behind her back. The car was involved in collision. As a result, Cheyenne suffered a spinal cord injury and was paralyzed from the waist down. The family filed a suit against ford motor co , alleging that the seatbelt was defectively designed. Could ford successfully claim that Cheyenne had misused the seatbelt? Why? Why not? What if the fact were different? And the legal environment dimension at the end of case. I need little bit elaborate., Thank you .