Flo Choi owns a small business and manages its accounting. Her company just finished a year in which a large number of borrowed funds were invested in a new building addition, as well as in equipment and fixture additions. Chois banker requires her to submit semiannual financial statements so he can monitor the financial health of her business. He has warned her that as profit margins erode, this might raise the interest rate on borrowed funds to reflect the increased loan risk from the banks point of view. Choi knows that profit margins are likely to decline this year. As she prepares year-end adjusting entries, she decides to apply the following depreciation rule: all asset additions are considered to be in use on the first day of the month following the purchase date. (The previous rules assume that assets are in use on the first day of the month nearest to the purchase dates.)

Required:

Managers must not only determine the date to place an asset in use, They must also decide what method to use, and estimate the useful life and any salvage value. With that in mind, share your thoughts about the ethics scenario in the Ethics Challenge, and respond to the following prompts:

1. How will Choi's new policy affect net income, and the interest rate that she is charged by the bank?
2. Do you think Flo Choi's decision to place assets in service as of the month following purchase an ethical violation, or is it a legitimate decision in computing depreciation?