Flo claims that pink was proper under Section 29, and any court would interpret the contract in Flo's favor. Would Section 29 likely be enforced?

Multiple Choice

• No, Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Flo.
• Yes, Shae should have read the contract more carefully and, if there was any ambiguity, she should have clarified it prior to signing.
• Yes, Shae signed the contract.
• Yes, Section 29 should be interpreted according to its plain language.
• Yes, Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Shae.