Focus on Critical Thinking: In your opinion, why does the law make it so difficult for plaintiffs to prove fraudulent misrepresentation? Why isn't it enough just to show that a defendant's statements were false or deceptive, regardless of whether such statements are about matters of fact or opinion?

(CASE 10.1: Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 212 So.2d 906 (Fla. 1968)