Following the #METOO movement, all Crooked County employees met with their business units where they received sensitivity training. During these meetings, the county employees received the following memo: MEMO To: All Crooked County Employees Subject: Anti-Toxic Masculinity Policy Crooked County wishes to maintain a work environment that is a safe space for all of its employees. Toxic Masculinity threatens that environment and will not be tolerated. Toxic masculine traits include but are not limited to bragging, mansplaining, aggressive posture, disagreeable tone, stoic behavior, and emotional insensitivity. Effective immediately, any Crooked County employee exhibiting toxic masculine traits will be fined according to the following schedule: Straight Men $500 Gay or Trans Men $250 Everyone Else $100 1. Pablo is a Crooked County employee. He films the training session and posts it on Twitter with the comment, "This is our company's new policy. This is crazy!" The next day, Crooked County fires Pablo for violating a law that county employees may not record and post work-related items to their social media pages. Paul sues.

Is this a content-based recording? If so, what two things does a company have to prove to satisfy to restrict this expression? Can the company prove those two things?