Followmg an argument, Richard punches Steve, who falls over, chipping a bone n1 h15 elbow. Richard walks away. As Steve is attempting to get up he bumps into Isobel, who has just turned the corner. Isobel, who is in a hurry, keeps on walking, and does not look behind her. As a consequence, she fails to see that Steve falls over and hits his head, which renders him unconscious. Steve is taken to hospital. Pradip, the hospital registrar, examines Steve, who is suffering om concussion as well as a painful elbow. Pradip, who is heavily intoxicated, fails to notice that Steve is suffering from concussion and discharges him. 011 the way home, Steve stumbles into the path of a car driven by Dolly, who was speaking on her mobile phone and not paying attention. Steve is badly injured 111 the resulting crash. (a) If you were a prosecutor, what would be your preferred charge in relation to Richard in the matter of Steve? (b) Give reasons for your choice in (a) including an explanation as to why you chose as you did rather than choosing a different charge. (c) If you were Richard's defence counsel, what arguments would you advance in response to the charge in (a)? (d) If you were prosecuting counsel, how would you respond to the arguments raised in (c)? (e) If you were a prosecutor, what would be your preferred charge in relation to Isobel in the matter of Steve? (f) Give reasons for your choice in (e) including an explanation as to why you chose as you did rather than choosing a different charge. (g) If you were Isobel's defence counsel, what arguments would you advance in response to the charge in (e)?I (h) If you were a prosecutor, how would you respond to the defence arguments raised in (g)? (i) Summarise all the issues of causation arising in this scenario and how they might be resolved