Foot Traffic, a carpet manufacturer, enters into a contract to buy 15 bags of wool from Black Sheep, a wool producer, and to pay by instalments. The bags are loaded onto a truck for delivery and sent to Foot Traffic. Foot Traffic agrees to pay in 10 equal instalments. Foot Traffic defaults after the sixth payment and has been placed into liquidation. Black Sheep has demanded return of the wool but Foot Traffic's liquidator claims that the property belongs to Foot Traffic. How would you advise Black Sheep? On the facts as known, Black Sheep is entitled to the return of the wool. O On the facts as known, Black Sheep is not entitled to the return of the wool