Question
For intermediate management accouting 324. Not sure if anyone is familiar with The Boston Bar Chocolate Company (BBCC) project. Need help if anyone has done
For intermediate management accouting 324.
Not sure if anyone is familiar with The Boston Bar Chocolate Company (BBCC) project. Need help if anyone has done one before.
You are Cindy, completing the analysis and developing a final report to Alan, President of BBCC. The report should analyze BBCCs current cost allocations and give advice for the future. It should be formatted as a memo and include the following: 1. (12 marks) Prepare a brief overview of the 20X7 results as an introduction to the report. Discuss any significant differences between the 20X7 budget and the actual figures. A full variance analysis is not expected or required. 2. (20 marks) a) (2 marks) BBCC has adopted a normal costing approach with manufacturing overhead costs allocated based on direct labour hours. However, the Actual Cost of Product Manufactured report presented in the project details document appears to have included an allocation of actual manufacturing overhead based on a percentage of sales. Revise this report so the normal costing approach adopted by the company is properly reflected. Work-in-process beginning and ending inventory for all three products is as follows: The-Bar Alamonde Salt-Lick Beginning inventory $1,196 $837 $0 Ending inventory 1,207 815 0
Prepare a revised income statement using the cost of goods manufactured in part a) and adjusting for over- or underapplied overhead. It is the companys policy to write off any over- or underapplied overhead to cost of goods sold during the period in which it is incurred. Comment on the change in gross margin overall, and for each product individually, as a result of the changes applied. The finished product beginning and ending inventory for all three products is as follows: The-Bar Alamonde Salt-Lick Beginning inventory $17,561 $10,702 $0 Ending inventory 18,292 10,497 0 c) (3 marks) Prepare an analysis of utilities costs using the data provided. Using the high-low method, determine how much of the monthly utilities costs for the year are fixed versus variable. Your answer should consist of a cost formula. Determine the accuracy of this formula by applying it to the totals in the 20X7 data and comparing the result to the actual cost. Consider that management is acceptable of a discrepancy of 3% on this cost estimation. (Note: Round the final fixed cost answer to the nearest dollar; however, do not round the variable cost figure when calculating total costs.)
d) (8 marks) i) Prepare an analysis that highlights idle capacity costs by analyzing manufacturing overhead as a whole, similar to the approach in Topic 2.3-10. Practical capacity is 12,000 direct labour hours (Note: Round the manufacturing overhead costs to the nearest dollar, however, do not round the MPH rate calculated when calculating the total costs.) (4 marks) ii) Explain the purpose of this analysis to management and the information it provides in relation to capacity utilization. (4 marks) e) (2 marks) Briefly comment on the results of parts a) and d) above
3. (8 marks) a) (4 marks) Based on the information provided by the cocoa bean processing division manager, assess the profits and gross margin percentage of each of the following options: i) Current sales of cocoa butter and cocoa cakes ii) Proposed sales of cocoa butter and canned, powdered baking cocoa iii) Proposed sales of chocolate liquor Comment on which of the three options is most desirable for the company to pursue. b) (4 marks) Allocate joint costs using the following options and methods: i) Based on the current sales of cocoa butter and cocoa cakes, use the sale value at split-off method. ii) Based on the proposed sales of cocoa butter and canned, powdered baking cocoa, use the net realizable method.
THE PROJECT DETAILS:
The profit margins on our current products can be found below. The most profitable product is the Salt-Lick bar at 25.9%, followed by Alamonde at 19.3% and The-Bar at 18.8%. Budgeted margins were 14.3%, 27.5% and 35.2% for The-Bar, Alamonde and Salt-Lick, respectively.
Actual operating income statement
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 The-Bar | Per bar | Alamonde | Per bar | Salt-Lick | Per bar | Total | |||||||||||
Volume | 776,000 | 528,000 | 302,500 | 1,606,500 | |||||||||||||
Sales | $ 1,164,000 | $1.50 | $ 897,600 | $1.70 | $ 605,000 | $2.00 | $ 2,666,600 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 945,593 | 724,674 | 448,187 | 2,118,454 | |||||||||||||
Gross margin | $ 218,407 | $ 172,926 | $ 156,813 | $ 548,146 | |||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses | 541,681 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ 6,465 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross margin % | 18.8% | 19.3% | 25.9% | 20.6% |
Budgeted operating income statement
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 The-Bar | Per bar | Alamonde | Per bar | Salt-Lick | Per bar | Total | |||||||||||
Volumes | 774,400 | 529,100 | 301,400 | 1,604,900 | |||||||||||||
Sales | $ 1,161,600 | $1.50 | $ 952,380 | $1.80 | $ 602,800 | $2.00 | $ 2,716,780 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 996,034 | 690,755 | 390,298 | 2,077,087 | |||||||||||||
Gross margin | $ 165,566 | $ 261,625 | $ 212,502 | $ 639,693 | |||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses | 542,554 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ 97,139 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross margin % | 14.3% | 27.5% | 35.2% | 23.5% | |||||||||||||
Actual cost of product manufactured
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 The-Bar | Alamonde | Salt-Lick | Total | ||||
Direct ingredients used | $ 333,506 | $ 232,724 | $ 129,948 | $ 696,178 | |||
Direct labour | 135,876 | 123,926 | 70,338 | 330,140 | |||
Manufacturing overhead | 476,954 | 367,795 | 247,901 | 1,092,650 | |||
Total manufacturing costs | $ 946,336 | $ 724,445 | $ 448,187 | $ 2,118,968 | |||
Add: Beginning work-in-process | 1,196 | 837 | 2,033 | ||||
Deduct: Ending work-in-process | (1,207) | (815) | (2,022) | ||||
Cost of goods manufactured | $ 946,325 | $ 724,467 | $ 448,187 | $ 2,118,979 | |||
Budgeted cost of product manufactured
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 The-Bar | Alamonde | Salt-Lick | Total | ||||
Direct ingredients used | $ 330,271 | $ 231,513 | $ 128,695 | $ 690,479 | |||
Direct labour | 147,744 | 101,736 | 57,996 | 307,476 | |||
Manufacturing overhead | 518,685 | 357,165 | 203,607 | 1,079,457 | |||
Total manufacturing costs | $ 996,700 | $ 690,414 | $ 390,298 | $ 2,077,412 | |||
Add: Beginning work-in-process | 2,991 | 2,094 | 5,085 | ||||
Deduct: Ending work-in-process | (2,885) | (1,949) | (4,834) | ||||
Cost of good manufactured | $ 996,806 | $ 690,559 | $ 390,298 | $ 2,077,663 | |||
Actual quantity and cost of direct ingredients
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 Ingredient | Price | The-Bar | Alamonde | Salt-Lick | Total | ||||||||||||||
Quantity | Cost | Quantity | Cost | Quantity | Cost | Quantity | Cost | ||||||||||||
Chocolate liquor | $5.55/kg | 27,160 | $150,738 | 18,480 | $102,564 | 8,894 | $49,359 | 54,534 | $302,661 | ||||||||||
Cocoa butter | $6.10/kg | 10,321 | 62,957 | 7,022 | 42,837 | 2,753 | 16,792 | 20,096 | 122,586 | ||||||||||
Cocoa powder | $1.18/kg | 5,432 | 6,410 | 2,218 | 2,617 | 2,118 | 2,499 | 9,768 | 11,525 | ||||||||||
Cane sugar | $0.70/kg | 10,321 | 7,225 | 7,022 | 4,916 | 6,247 | 4,372 | 23,590 | 16,513 | ||||||||||
Emulsifier | $0.80/kg | 462 | 369 | 739 | 590 | 212 | 169 | 1,413 | 1,129 | ||||||||||
Vanilla | $70/litre | 625 | 43,728 | 370 | 25,872 | 424 | 29,645 | 1,418 | 99,245 | ||||||||||
Almonds | $10/kg | 1,109 | 11,088 | 1,109 | 11,088 | ||||||||||||||
Himalayan salt | $5.50/kg | 529 | 2,912 | 529 | 2,912 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of ingredients | $271,427 | $190,484 | $105,748 | $567,659 | |||||||||||||||
Wrappers | $0.08/bar | 776,000 | 62,080 | 528,000 | 42,240 | 302,500 | 24,200 | 1,606,500 | 128,520 | ||||||||||
Total cost | $333,506 | $232,724 | $129,948 | $696,179 | |||||||||||||||
Budgeted quantity and cost of direct ingredients
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 Ingredient | Price | The-Bar | Alamonde | Salt-Lick | Total | ||||||||||||||
Quantity | Cost | Quantity | Cost | Quantity | Cost | Quantity | Cost | ||||||||||||
Chocolate liquor | $5.50/kg | 27,104 | $149,072 | 18,519 | $101,852 | 8,861 | $48,736 | 54,484 | $299,660 | ||||||||||
Cocoa butter | $6.00/kg | 10,300 | 61,797 | 7,037 | 42,222 | 2,743 | 16,456 | 20,079 | 120,476 | ||||||||||
Cocoa powder | $1.15/kg | 5,421 | 6,234 | 2,222 | 2,556 | 2,110 | 2,426 | 9,753 | 11,216 | ||||||||||
Cane sugar | $0.70/kg | 10,300 | 7,210 | 7,037 | 4,926 | 6,224 | 4,357 | 23,560 | 16,492 | ||||||||||
Emulsifier | $0.80/kg | 461 | 369 | 741 | 593 | 211 | 169 | 1,412 | 1,130 | ||||||||||
Vanilla | $70/litre | 625 | 43,637 | 370 | 25,926 | 424 | 29,537 | 1,418 | 99,101 | ||||||||||
Almonds | $10/kg | 1,109 | 11,111 | 1,109 | 11,111 | ||||||||||||||
Himalayan salt | $5.50/kg | 529 | 2,901 | 529 | 2,901 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of ingredients | $268,319 | $189,186 | $104,582 | $562,087 | |||||||||||||||
Wrappers | $0.08/bar | 776,000 | 61,952 | 528,000 | 42,328 | 302,500 | 24,112 | 1,606,500 | 128,392 | ||||||||||
Total cost | $330,271 | $231,514 | $128,694 | $690,479 | |||||||||||||||
Actual direct labour
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 The-Bar | Alamonde | Salt-Lick | Total | ||||
Direct labour hours | 4,105 | 3,744 | 2,125 | 9,974 | |||
Cost per direct labour hour | $ 33.10 | $ 33.10 | $ 33.10 | $ 33.10 | |||
Total actual direct labour costs | $ 135,876 | $ 123,926 | $ 70,338 | $ 330,140 | |||
Budgeted direct labour
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 The-Bar | Alamonde | Salt-Lick | Total | ||||
Direct labour hours | 4,560 | 3,140 | 1,790 | 9,490 | |||
Cost per labour hour | $ 32.40 | $ 32.40 | $ 32.40 | $ 32.40 | |||
Total budgeted direct labour cost | $ 147,744 | $ 101,736 | $ 57,996 | $ 307,476 | |||
Actual manufacturing overhead
For the year ended December 31, 20X7 Variable | |||
Plant utilities | $ 103,584 | ||
Equipment maintenance | 89,566 | $ 193,150 | |
Fixed | |||
Quality control | $ 37,500 | ||
Computer and supplies | 188,000 | ||
Plant and equipment amortization | 150,000 | ||
Research and development | 135,000 | ||
Indirect plant salary and wages | 193,000 | ||
Plant lease | 196,000 | 899,500 | |
Total manufacturing overhead | $ 1,092,650 | ||
Budgeted manufacturing overhead
For the year ended December 31,20X7 Variable | |||
Plant utilities | $ 101,876 | ||
Equipment maintenance | 91,081 | $ 192,957 | |
Fixed | |||
Quality control | $ 39,000 | ||
Computer and supplies | 189,000 | ||
Plant and equipment amortization | 150,000 | ||
Research and development | 120,000 | ||
Indirect plant salary and wages | 192,500 | ||
Plant lease | 196,000 | 886,500 | |
Total manufacturing overhead | $ 1,079,457 | ||
One of the cost issues faced by the company is understanding what the variable costs are and what the fixed costs are. The manufacturing overhead schedule shows plant utilities as a purely variable cost, yet even with no machinery running the company gets a bill. So a study was conducted on the plant utilities costs compared to direct machine hours. The information is provided below:
Utilities costs and machine hour data
The following are 23 months of data relating to monthly utilities costs and number of machine hours. Month | Plant utilities | Machine hours |
February, 20X6 | $ 8,674 | 650 |
March, 20X6 | 8,500 | 625 |
April, 20X6 | 8,750 | 629 |
May, 20X6 | 9,483 | 745 |
June, 20X6 | 9,497 | 664 |
July, 20X6 | 9,611 | 748 |
August, 20X6 | 8,687 | 653 |
September, 20X6 | 8,338 | 656 |
October, 20X6 | 8,703 | 699 |
November, 20X6 | 8,931 | 701 |
December, 20X6 | 7,870 | 610 |
January, 20X7 | 7,328 | 571 |
February, 20X7 | 8,084 | 620 |
March, 20X7 | 8,506 | 665 |
April, 20X7 | 8,591 | 662 |
May, 20X7 | 9,516 | 749 |
June, 20X7 | 9,431 | 656 |
July, 20X7 | 9,608 | 761 |
August, 20X7 | 8,674 | 656 |
September, 20X7 | 8,421 | 667 |
October, 20X7 | 8,674 | 690 |
November, 20X7 | 8,843 | 671 |
December, 20X7 | 7,908 | 621 |
Total | 200,628 | 15,369 |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started