For many years, the jacket design for Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary featured a bright red background. The front was dominated by a \"bull's eye\" logo. The center of the bull's eye was white with the title of the book in blue. MerriamWebster registered this logo as a trademark. Random House published a dictionary with a red dust jacket, the title in large black and white letters, and Random House's \"house\" logoan angular drawing of a housein white. What claim might MerriamWebster make against Random House? Would it be successful? Merriam-Webster alleged that Random House had violated its trade dress. The court found for Random House because the logos and the color of the typeface were different. Merriam-Webster, Inc. v. Random House, 35 F.3d 65 (2d Cir. 1994)