For questions 1, 2 and 3, consider the admissibility of evidence under FRE 401, 402, and 403. arguments for and against admissibility. FRE 412 and 413 apply to question 3. Argue for and against the admissibly of the facts of the prior offenses. answers should be several paragraphs for each question. should be able to answer all three questions in three to five pages. 1. The defendant is charged with murder. The victim was shot and a .38 caliber bullet was removed from his body. The defendant was arrested a few days later and a search warrant was executed on the defendant's residence. A search recovered 22 handguns that were seized from the defendant's residence. Two of the handguns were .38 caliber. None of the firearms recovered from the defendant were found to be the weapon used to shoot the victim. Argue for and against the admissibility of the handguns recovered from the defendant's residence. 2. The defendant is charged with making a fraudulent loan application in which he knowingly misstated and underreported his debts. The prosecution gives the defendant notice that it intends to introduce evidence that the defendant made two other loan applications at other banks within the