For this question, I would like for you to relate the concepts to an everyday life situation and identify which version of the situation fits the definition of a between subjects factorial design, which version of the situation fits the definition of a within subjects factorial design, and which version of the situation fits the definition of a mixed factorial design.

Situation 1 A group of 4 friends get together and decide that they would like to try 2 restaurants (Restaurant A and Restaurant B) for both lunch and dinner. The 4 friends split up and each person tries one of the four situations. One person tries Restaurant A for breakfast, one person tries Restaurant A for lunch, one person tries Restaurant B for breakfast, and one person tries Restaurant B for lunch. The four friends then get together and compare their experiences. Situation 2 A group of 4 friends get together and decide that they would like to try 2 restaurants (Restaurant A and Restaurant B) for both lunch and dinner. The 4 friends split up into two groups of 2 people. One group tries Restaurant A for both breakfast and lunch. One group tries Restaurant B for both breakfast and lunch. The two groups then get together to compare their experiences. Situation 3 A group of 4 friends get together and decide that they would like to try 2 restaurants (Restaurant A and Restaurant B) for both lunch and dinner. Each person tries all 4 situations (Restaurant A for breakfast, Restaurant A for lunch, Restaurant B for breakfast, and Restaurant B for lunch). 1. Which situation reminds you of a between subjects factorial design? 2. Which situation reminds you of a within subjects factorial design? 3. Which situation reminds you of a mixed factorial design?