For this question, you will be first reviewing the following link: https://www.npr.org/2021/09/10/1036043886/apple-fortnite-epic-games-ruling-explained

Based on the above link, please provide your analysis of what you think of the case, as well as a structured case summary in the following format (fact, issue, rule, analysis, conclusion):

Fact: Please provide the pertinent facts in detail. Anything that is not presented here should NOT be used below in your analysis. Therefore, the fact sufficiency is key.

Issue: The issue statement should use general terms to describe parties, and include the brief and specific legal element you will use as a standard to guide in answering the question.

Rule: Please state the exact rule for the issue.

When a section is an issue statement, fact, analysis, or conclusion, for example, please not add with anything else, as they should go to their respective and proper section anyway.

Analysis: You should compare the pertinent fact presented in the fact section with the rule of theory you have adopted to answer the issue statement. If not presented in the fact section, you should not use it in the analysis section.

Conclusion: Use general terms. Please simply reiterate your issue statement without "Whether" on the basis of your analysis.