Forest Products, Incorporated, manufactures three products $($FP$-10,$ FP$-20,$ and FP$-40)$ from a single, joint input. None of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $$241,300.$ Additional information follows:

Product Units Produced Sales Values Processing Costs $($After Split$-$Off$)$

FP$-10105,000$ $ $177,750$ $ $29,300$

FP$-20157,500311,250109,300$

FP$-4087,50085,30025,300$

The sale of FP$-40$ has been banned by a recent law. If FP$-40$ is produced, disposal in an approved manner costs $$120,000$ for every $87,500$ units produced.

Required:

Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and sell FP$-10$ and FP$-20.$ What joint costs would be allocated to FP$-10$ and FP$-20?$

There is a possibility that a market for FP$-10$ and FP$-20$ at split$-$off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to sell the two products rather than process them further. At what sales value $($at split$-$off$)$ would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split$-$off and processing them further?

At what sales value $($at split$-$off$)$ would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split$-$off and processing them further, in case the disposal cost for FP$-40$ increases to $$150,000$ for every $87,500$ units of FP$-40$ produced?